Since boy first met girl drama was born to the world.
Despite our recent advances in technology scientists still have not found a viable solution to the plague that seems to strike us from the womb.
Drama serves a valuable purpose in our life, filling our hours of water cooler time with topics above and beyond the day’s events.
The he said she said serves as valuable fodder for an entertainment industry that slowly lurches towards a balance of pretentious lunacy and viable responsible actions.
Yes your wealthy yes you have a right to use your wealth to communicate a message. Yes you should attend to the causes you believe in. No I don’t really need or care about your views. No I am not really interested in what you have to say. No I don’t think your educated enough to make an appropriate decision on the topic.
A problem lies within drama as it seems to cascade down onto the general populace. In fact there is no seems there only is. The joy of the internet has provided is the veil of anonymity. From the throne of the almighty people are freed to embellish upon us their wisdom and venom. I present to you simple steps in order to argue on the internet:
- If you disagree with someone, insult them. Good insults include: fanboy, commie/leftie, redneck/hillbilly, or any reference to the poster's mother or size of genitalia
- If anyone disagrees with you, see point 1 above. Additionally, suggest they should move to China/North Korea/Nazi Germany, where they wouldn't be allowed an opinion.
- Prevent any rational discussion from starting by pre-emptively attacking people before they get to answer. For example "go ahead, mod me down. Anyone who agrees is a stinking [insert insult here]"
- Don't let facts, figures or other such bizarre notions get in the way of your rant. If you choose to use any facts, quotes or other material, just pick out the bits that "prove" what you think
- Be inconsistent and self-contradictory. This makes it more difficult for anyone to make sense of what you said and attempt to counter it.
In my life to relax I play with an active group of around 80 people doing online gaming. In the game as in life might makes right and large numbers of people are needed to achieve goals. The coordination of these efforts are reserved for popular members of the group who seem to excel at administration, problem solving and diplomacy.
Again the same as life there are a group of people who pursue this endeavor with leisure and there are those who pursue with vigor. It is the vigorous who often feel that they are dragging the leisurely with them. It is near impossible for a vigorous person to understand the point of view of the leisure. The leisure often understands the point of the vigorous but don’t really care even though they may express that they do. In this case it is fair to say that the 80/20 rule is in full affect. 20% of the membership is providing 80% of the resources and content for the group.
So where is drawn the middle line?
A lawyer would look at things that have been agreed upon by the community. In this group of people an agreement has been reached which by my interpretation seems to favor a leisurely pace. All members both leisure and vigorous have signed an agreement to these rules.
A lawmaker could view the issue in a more progressive way. If it wasn’t for the vigorous there would be very little reason at all for their to be a community. The vigorous in fact are the providers to the community and therefore should rightfully be given the task of setting the pace. The vigorous’s goals are not to alienate or infringe on the rights of the leisures but rather to grant more opportunities for all.
Clearly there are no easy answers, in fact management gurus across the world and time itself have tried to find the solution to the riddle. It is my belief that in these times there is a need for team leadership to mitigate the compromise. Typically this is influenced by renewed goal setting. Removing some resources by diverting them from one objective to the next or focusing fire. In this case it may be a need to evaluate what will bring in more bang for its buck.
Unfortunately these types of decisions tend to defer to the leisure’s which will not at all provide any form of motivation to any party. The vigorous feel betrayed and the leisure’s are placated. In the big picture both vigorous and leisure are replaceable. Despite their efforts the grind goes on with or without them. In this membership and similarly to the real world; people come people go but the motion never stops.
It boils down to leadership. Leadership will make or break the organization. To be continued..